<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limbo little lower?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.catholicsphere.com/2006/10/10/limbo-little-lower.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.catholicsphere.com/2006/10/10/limbo-little-lower.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://blog.catholicsphere.com/2006/10/10/limbo-little-lower.html#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 01:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.catholicsphere.com/2006/10/10/limbo-little-lower.html#comment-467</guid>
		<description>Well, personally, I don't see why the Theological Commiission has any interest is discussing limbo. It's a fun game, especially after you've had a couple. :-)

Seriously, though, I think "limbo" is really bad theology, and ought to be pitched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, personally, I don&#8217;t see why the Theological Commiission has any interest is discussing limbo. It&#8217;s a fun game, especially after you&#8217;ve had a couple. <img src='http://catholicsphere.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously, though, I think &#8220;limbo&#8221; is really bad theology, and ought to be pitched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
